There's no evidence presented in the story that he:
- Knows details about the campaigns
- Interfered with the campaigns
- Participated in the campaigns
- Failed to declare he worked for the company
Oh, and the Mail doesn't tell us how much he earns for those four days. So the scandal is what precisely?
My suggestion to the Mail - go back to picture stories of cancer-ridden toddlers in santa hats. It's not news either, but at least readers can see cute infants with their cereal and not Andrew Lansley.
No comments:
Post a Comment